nostalgesia….
July 10, 2008
When I were a lad all good poetry rhymed
And had rhythm and metre and style.
Spoken aloud t’ words thundered or chimed
(Which made learning t’ buggers worthwhile.)
Back then, poets wrote about poetic things
Like Greek urns, or that Burns piece on mice;
Or t’ lad who remained up on deck ’till well-singed,
And t’ Raven I thought were quite nice.
Ornithologists, most of ‘em: keen on bird guff,
Allus rattlin’ on about sparrers,
Or nightingales, owls (whether hooting or stuffed; )
Even chickens that haunt wheeled red barrers.
Em’s immortality, Bill’s narcissisity,
Albatross Sam and Jack’s pitiless whore;
Alf’s equine massacre, Will’s domesticity,
Paradise John, Hal’s monotonous squaw.
Proper poets they were, writin’ verse with their quills:
Red roses and summers’ days, gold daffodils,
Blue hills remembered, the riffin’ of “If”;
(No rude stuff ’bout blue pills for members unstiff.)
Mighty rulers of yore, inspirational muses:
Them’s suitable subjects a real poet chooses.
Like everything else, verse has gone to to the dogs:
I’m blamin’ it all on these new-fangled blogs….
July 10, 2008 at 11:04 pm
obooki on doggerel:
http://www.theparanoiac.com/obookispage/
July 10, 2008 at 11:10 pm
Now that one steve I liked. ‘Twere done well. Well done.
July 10, 2008 at 11:19 pm
Ta. I’m only disappointed I couldn’t accommodate an “o’er”….
July 10, 2008 at 11:23 pm
Good stuff, cs. 2 posts in as many days…you’re becoming almost prolific.
July 10, 2008 at 11:47 pm
Mishari – I was desperate to overwrite the previous post: even doggerelists experience shame
Meanwhile, the bare bones of this one had been languishing as a draft for months….
July 11, 2008 at 6:17 am
Aye, good lad, well crafted. You’ve been borrowing that Billy’s oily rag and monkey wrench again, haven’t you. Well, to good effect. You know when to leave the o’ers alone; you can hev too much of a good thing.
July 11, 2008 at 11:39 am
(from comments on your last pome, not this one)
‘even with an open invite to plug it’s amusing to see who’s shameless and who’s diffident about it…’
You are much too diffident. . . A whole day gone by, apparently, since this new post. Couldn’t you have mentioned it in a single line on GU — yes I know that you don’t come there much yourself, but ropeofsand always seems to know what you’re up to and could have tipped us off . . .
dgg, how about reciting this one to us — I know I couldn’t get the accent exactly right. I mean, in an audio clip? Or doesn’t WordPress make that possible?
July 11, 2008 at 12:50 pm
From todays Grauniad:
The fundraiser diners were entertained by the Bee Gees’ Robin Gibb, who performed several hits at the end of the evening, including Tragedy and Jive Talkin’.
“It’s not just about the event itself but it’s about being here for Gordon,” he said.
Brown, a “good friend”, is known to be a fan of his music.
Yeah, sure he is..Gordon Brown, disco bunny. I found Gibb’s choice of songs especially apposite…and, hey, can things really be so bad if Robin Gibb is there for you? Erm…you bet your life they can. Worse, in fact.
July 11, 2008 at 1:30 pm
wordnerd – to plug or not to plug? I constantly wrestle with that conundrum….the G’s blogs are undoubtedly the best place to do so, even though, as one commenter noted recently, a link there gathers perhaps ten clicks….most of those who plug regularly are wannabe fiction writers or poets; I’m not that creature….I’ll admit it would be gratifying to attract a few more regular readers & commenters here (as part of the conversation, not as a fan club….) but recent plugging hasn’t succeeded in that regard….
What I apparently ought to be doing is the social round of other blogs, leaving quaint comments and subtly begging for links; but I’m not that creature either….I believe it was smpugh who said on GU something along the lines of, she’d hoped that blogging would obviate the need for social contact….quite….
As for audio recordings – never! And no YouDoggerel either, before anyone asks….
July 11, 2008 at 10:06 pm
‘but recent plugging hasn’t succeeded in that regard….’
Mmmm, could it be that many GU readers are just plain pome-ed out? . . . Though your doggerelling doesn’t in the least resemble modern poetry — being neither obscure nor precious — it is of course written in verse, so looks like it superficially. . . Also . . . never mind if I get shot for saying this by your other regulars . . . all the pome-related blogs are kept artificially afloat and in the Most Active Blogs list by a pome club.
Blogs that look too clubby put off newcomers. I have tiptoed out of many a Cif discussion myself soon after a first post, for exactly that reason. But newcomers are what the GU booksblog needs desperately — and since your relationship is symbiotic, your site would also benefit from a large inflow of new blood there.
I wondered if the GU eds weren’t trying to encourage exactly that with the Hay deck chair contest comments that they chose to highlight, .. . as they desperately moved the post announcing the contest to the top of the page, yet again. . . Every one highlighted read like the blogging equivalent of ‘What I did in my summer holidays.’ . . The idea seemed to be to show that they _don’t_ want relatively sophisticated and intimidating bloggers like the ones they’ve got but more Anybloggers, hundreds of them, like the newbies who come swarming in to post single lines in list articles and last turned out in force for Chas.
Too bad that you won’t try an audio clip, dgg. Something tells me that you’re a wizard mimic.
July 11, 2008 at 11:05 pm
wordnerd – I think the “clubbiness” is a factor – although it’s something I’d rather see here than not….and I guess most of the people from GU who can tolerate doggerel are already here….
Blogs like these, where the blogmeister puts up original work, are in any case often awkward to comment on – does one start with fulsome praise, a tactful change of subject, or honest criticsm….? Indeed, a lot of similar blogs don’t allow comments; and many of those that do tend to have a small coterie of commenters only….I should perhaps do some more neutral or opinion pieces….and as I’ve said before, if anyone wants to email me with a piece for the blog, I’ll be delighted….
July 11, 2008 at 11:09 pm
BTW – Is that someone stealing Mishari’s art thunder on Billy’s thread, or the real Mishari throwing a wobbly….?
July 11, 2008 at 11:10 pm
As a life-long cat lover, I know a dead cat when I see one. Likewise, the Grauniad. As a lifelong reader, I know a dead paper when I see one.
Art Pepper has handed in his sax. I leave the paper to wordnerd7 and her poetry conspiracies. I’ve changed my homepage to the NYT.
Think I’ll concetrate on my own blog. Tell the story of the man I shot…or the man who shot me…(they’re different men and different stories). Gee whiz, it might even be more interesting than articles about ‘Is this the greatest Booker Prize winner of all time, or what?’…yeah, fascinaing. Watch this space.
July 11, 2008 at 11:18 pm
Have you consecrated a new blog yet?
July 11, 2008 at 11:29 pm
Sorry, cs…and sorry, Billy…I just lost my rag after having a comment deleted from the tech blogs. Deleted, I might add, for no discernible reason except going against the prevailing ‘Oh, Isn’t Apple Groovy’ grain. Enough is enough.
The Telegraph
gives me polite, helpful replies. The Grauniad deletes me for even less reason than they banned me. Fuck ‘em. They want to go down-market, (and they clearly do)?, they can go without me. I no longer recognize the paper I grew up with.
One of us has to go, and they’re too stupid to know an exit when they see one… fu7c\king moreonsz
July 11, 2008 at 11:47 pm
Nah, cs, I’ll just revive my old wordspress blog. I know Mowbray is keen to hear about the Lebanese actress and gunplay can only be a bonus….there are 2 kinds of writers, I think.
The gifted writer of fiction who can create scenes and situations that live and my kind, who can only relate what happened, and try to make it amusing…I’ll try to be entertaining as well as offering cautionery lessons for you heedless yoots. Actually, I think I’ll turn my old blogspot into an ongoing Grauniad critique. No shortage of material there.,..
July 11, 2008 at 11:50 pm
Well, just let us know when it’s rocking again & I’ll happily reinstate the link here….
July 12, 2008 at 1:10 am
A club is not a conspiracy, a distinction that the Artful Pepper might want to think about..
Conspiring entails secrecy and scheming. But eccentric people who love modern poetry banding together to support pome blogs involves neither of these.
Keeping a blog afloat artificially afloat can imply (i) a huge percentage of empty ‘filler’ posts, and (ii) brilly bloggers posting under multiplying screen names, with ingenious biographical details to match . . . But artifice, too, does not imply a conspiracy.
In the ‘good old days’ before pome-writing took over the booksblog site – and I’m referring to the recent past – verse appeared spontaneously. It was seldom obscure because it was usually referring to, or inspired by, the lead post. Everyone could understand, share the joke, if any, and feel included. Very much the OPPOSITE of modern poetry, as defined in 10 (above). . . It is actually easier to appreciate a real gift for poetry when lines of genuinely inspired verse appear as a surprise offering, . . . in a string of earthbound prose comments. . . . That was, after all, how most of us ‘met’ cynicalsteve, then mishari and Isa.
On the other hand, all-pome threads can read the way pot-luck buffets taste – soy noodles next to tandoori trout, boeuf bourgignon next to the late British Rail’s recipe for rubbery-pork-chop-with-pineapple-slice and Bird’s Eye boil-in-the-bag-cod-with-white-sauce next to slices of durian, first-rate cassoulet, Wimpy burger with soggy bun, pike quenelles, saltimbocca alla Romana, cold porridge, vichyssoise and crisp Beijing duck. . . a bit womitty, in other words, because of the jangling juxtapositions – even though some dishes may have been cooked perfectly.
I don’t mean to offend anyone – I find these threads indigestible for the same reason I can’t read short story collections, even by the same author. . . I like to enter deeply into a particular imagined world and, or, emotional state . . . not be jerked from one to another. . . It’s just possible that there are other GU blog readers who feel the same way.
This is anyway just an exchange of opinions, misharious. No reason for anyone to get huffy and flounce away, I would suggest.
July 12, 2008 at 5:27 am
Wordnerd7
What is the matter with you, you know that evaluations are done on site hits, not on the number of contributors? If a site is of interest to the general public then of course a newspaper will continue.
BTW you keep repeating the same theme of a club, implying a collection of people gathering to-gether. Who are they Wordnerd, you obviously are one of them.
ps. I once worked for a limited period for a very well known world media identity.
July 12, 2008 at 6:47 am
In addition to my comments in 19, wordnerd, if it was proved that a group of people concerted to-gether in any way to detrimentally affect a newspaper site, then of course it would be legally actionable.
July 12, 2008 at 8:06 am
Oh dear Min, now you’re barking, too, and I thought we were friends . . . :
‘What is the matter with you, you know that evaluations are done on site hits, not on the number of contributors?’
Well, if you have it on good authority that great hordes, both washed and unwashed, are clicking away avidly at the _pome_ _threads_, who am I to disagree? Check on what I said upthread, here, in 10 and you’ll see that I was only asking a q-u-e-s-t-i-o-n . . . this one: ‘could it be that many GU readers are just plain pome-ed out?’ . . .
No statement, only an enquiry; a wondering.
Admittedly, it is a little odd that hardly anyone objective in this mass of click fiends you mention is posting comments on the GU pome threads that scream ‘Bis! Bis!’ — since all we seem to get are the same old bloggers, some with huge and splendid wardrobes for on-screen personae. But yes, whatever you say . . . and please treat any scepticism on my part as details, mere details . . .
‘If a site is of interest to the general public then of course a newspaper will continue.’
Oh, absolutely. For instance, a few weeks ago, I only narrowly avoided being swept out to sea by the tidal wave of posts supporting Isa’s proposal that an above-the-line pome geek be crowned national laureate. (. . . a total of 33 comments, was it?)
‘BTW you keep repeating the same theme of a club, implying a collection of people gathering to-gether. Who are they Wordnerd, you obviously are one of them.’
I am only in this funny little wooffle club, Min, and strictly because (i) I sense the presence of other Groucho Marxians, and (ii) doggerel is not modern poetry, thank … well, … you’d do for a tutelary deity, Min . . . To be perfectly clear about (i), I might mean, at least one other (naturally that couldn’t be dgg, since he’s said he _wants_ this place to be clubby.)
‘ps. I once worked for a limited period for a very well known world media identity.’
Please, Min, you could have spared us such a depressing fact. No hacks please, we’re dog-worshippers.
‘In addition to my comments in 19, wordnerd, if it was proved that a group of people concerted to-gether in any way to detrimentally affect a newspaper site, then of course it would be legally actionable.’
Whatever is the matter with you and mishari? WHERE have I said CONCERTED? And who said anything about DETRIMENTAL? She harps on about an accusation of a ‘conspiracy’ that was never made, then crackles away in high dudgeon in her starched petticoats (yes, yes, I’m told that Kuwaiti women also wear these, nowadays.)
She seems equally obsessed with the idea that I think there’s something criminally or ethically wrong with pome nerds supporting pome threads. Get this straight please: I DON’T . . . Chacun a son gout . . . oui? . . . Not all of us are bored to stupefaction by pome pontificators and week after week of groaning pome buffets. Long may they continue! . . . as they surely will.
July 12, 2008 at 8:36 am
Come on, Wordnerd..are you losing it?
July 12, 2008 at 9:30 am
Oh, and Wordnerd (from your post 21) I suspect I need to address
“Whatever is the matter with you and mishari?”
Why did you bring Mishari into this? In fact why have you ever….
Please explain.
July 12, 2008 at 11:43 am
Min,
About your question in 23, why don’t you ask her? Why does a suggestion to the doggerelist that an excess of pome-ry could be putting people off the GU booksblog make mishari fly into such a frightful tizz and pack her marbles and go home? Isn’t this a chat joint for spacers, as OY/Des used to say? . . . That made mishari mention me, Min, I didn’t ‘bring’ her ‘into this’.
obooki on doggerelling is v. good indeed. Thanks for the tip, dgg.
About your question in 22, alas, ’twas ever thus.
July 12, 2008 at 11:53 am
Oh dear. .. . Min, the last sentence of my 24 was also addressed to you, not dgg. . . Silly laptop.
Sorry for the confusion.
July 12, 2008 at 12:09 pm
Can I say, nice try, Wordnerd….
July 12, 2008 at 1:29 pm
Wordnerd,
Now let’s return to my posts 19 and 20.
July 12, 2008 at 2:12 pm
BM: “Who owns that blog? Not much cop, whoever they are.”
I had to laugh: they’ve just made him judge of the new Warwick Prize for Literary Unreadability. No, seriously.
July 12, 2008 at 2:41 pm
Actually, that was a bit of a misrepresentation: the prize is really for: “an intellectual, scientific and/or imaginative advance [which is] written with an energy and clarity that makes it accessible and attractive to a wide audience.”
It will be interesting though, if only to have our friendly blogger’s post-modern gibberish pitted against the evil metanarrative that is scientific reasoning.
July 12, 2008 at 3:53 pm
Where did you read that obooki? It’s not yet on the page about the Warwick prize that Lindesay Irvine linked to in his GU piece. I’d assumed btw that the Warwick Poet Laureate would also be on the judging roster….
July 12, 2008 at 4:22 pm
I read it here first, and then on his own blog:
http://www.readysteadybook.com/Blog.aspx
OK, so it’s only self-evidenced, but why would he make it up?
July 12, 2008 at 5:05 pm
I like following the career of David Mitchell since I went to school with him. I find he often reflects on that innocent and paradisical time, as do I: hence his piece today bringing back memories:
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/sport/2008/07/12/i_want_a_long_rest_from_a_game.html
July 12, 2008 at 7:03 pm
Another Abingdonian, eh? Most of my kid’s male friends at U were old boys. They formed a major portion of the audience at the M and Webb show in Plymouth.
Glad to hear Random Irritation is back on the block: gutted to hear Artpepper has gone to the block.
I discovered, in Tuesday’s G, that Aaronovitch is also a ‘54 man. A black day.
July 12, 2008 at 7:20 pm
No, that’s not true. Even though it says it on Wiki, he was never at Abingdon – I’m sure of it. (What’s he trying to hide). Seriously, I went there myself and I don’t remember him. I was referring to going to prep school with him. Besides, they never played football at Abingdon – it was a strictly rugby playing school (football was for the working-classes) – although i personally got out of it by playing fives. (yeah, it’s squash with padded gloves).
It says on Wiki he was “top of the class at Primary School” – well, it was “prep school” as I say, but he was largely top of the class, along with another five kids. I was usually seventh or so, because (as I realise now) I never did any work whatsoever during my entire school career.
“kid’s male friends at U” – personally, I avoided all my ex-school colleagues at U, and have never met anyone from there since. Abingdon was a very divided school – them and us, you know.
July 12, 2008 at 8:17 pm
It must be a large school if you missed him. My d. mentioned it in the context of going to the show-the Abingdon chaps were busily claiming him as one of their own. They would be 21 now, so he probably wouldn’t have been at the school when they went, if he in fact did (which he obviously didn’t, if you didn’t notice him). Perhaps they got the info off Wiki.
I recognise the football/rugby thing. I had quite a heated discussion with one she brought here for a couple of days, though as it turned out he rated lacrosse above either. It was definitely a class issue. She gets very irate about the way they characterise anyone who doesn’t speak or dress the way they do as chavs (which includes her). Individually of course it’s a different matter.
I hear the Abingdon uniform (or was it the sports kit?) was guaranteed to boil the blood of the local yoof.
July 12, 2008 at 8:53 pm
good morals to be ellicited from despair, sandy scenarios, high spirits hanging from clouds, and nice to meet you again, look forward to reading your many posts, enjoy my second masterpiece “Where”, posted to BM´s, meanwhile.
Yours ever humbly,
July 12, 2008 at 9:08 pm
He must have there then, I suppose. It just seems strange that I don’t remember him when I’d been in the same school as him for the previous six years and I must have been in some of his classes at Abingdon. (I can’t imagine he wouldn’t have been in top-set Maths, for instance).
Wiki implies that his first role as Rabbit in Winnie-the-Pooh was at Abingdon, but it wasn’t. It was before that. I know because I was a mouse. (What do you mean, there are no mice in W-t-P?). If I’d have been Rabbit, I too might have gone on to great things. (I do now remember playing cards back-stage though. I’d forgotten about that).
July 12, 2008 at 9:26 pm
Call me obsessive, but I googled and he’s quoted in Times Online as saying he went to Abingdon. How could you forget those pitch-black eyes?
At least you were only a mouse. Imagine how Winnie feels, peaking at 12 and being overtaken by the supporting rabbit.
July 12, 2008 at 10:00 pm
Sorry doggerelist,
but Wordnerd has been running between sites; you can check even here, as he has stated – see you at the other site….
now bookofsand, recognise the email address is the same as ropeofsand,
you are here on who’s behalf?
July 12, 2008 at 10:44 pm
oh sorry, tbos I may not have made my post 39 clear,
you are clearly not doing a character play you are representing a group, I am enquiring – who?
July 13, 2008 at 12:00 am
Oh oh oh . . . Min, obooki and tbos . . . for this report I’m about to submit to the new Mowbray gone all froggie-foo-foo, all the right people were on the thread this afternoon, when I couldn’t unfortunately check in. .. .. I hope you see this anyway, comrades . . . Dear old bean, I want you to know that there’s been no slackening of the pace at Monoglot Corp., and that some of our work has even been featured in that august organ, the NYT. As part of our marketing strategy, it’s been featured as a quiz, and as you’ll see from these examples, our work has soared far above the standard of that famous braised shirt:
====
7. In 1987, Elinor Lipman received a letter from the Japanese translator of her story collection, “Into Love and Out Again.” “Dear Mr. Alinor Lipman,” the letter began, “Some questions come out.” They included “Page 39: What is B-school?”; “Page 93: What is health plan?”; and “Page 151: ‘Sabie Hawkins’: Is it a name of a dancehall?” What strange fate had befallen Mr. Alinor Lipman?
a) The letter had been typed by the translator’s assistant
b) The translator had written the letter in Japanese, then had it translated
c) The translator was less talented than she might have been
d) The letter was a prank being played on “Alinor” by Lipman’s friend, Meg Wolitzer
8. In the Brazilian edition of Jacquelyn Mitchard’s novel “The Deep End of the Ocean,” the passage “Beth truly wanted to be mad. A few bricks shy of a load. A few ants short of a picnic” was translated as:
a) “Beth felt like a drunk who couldn’t get served a drink.”
b) “Beth felt like an ant who hadn’t been invited to the picnic.”
c) “Beth felt like a brick that had been pulled from a wall.”
d) “Beth felt like a picnic. A big, crazy picnic.”
====
Solutions and more stellar samples here: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/06/books/review/Alford-t.html
. . . Wouldn’t a blog that specialised in translations of this quality be one we’d bookmark and visit every day? . . .
July 13, 2008 at 7:47 am
Wordnerd I did look at the link, likely too intellectual for me; it didn’t appeal.
July 13, 2008 at 2:11 pm
Mildly interesting, wn7. Do you know this piece from a long-ago Spectator comp.? The task set was to write a letter in ‘English’ from the proprietor of a small hotel in the Dolomites in answer to a holiday enquiry.
Dear Sir or Madam,
Having recently taken over the propriety of this notorious house, I am wishful that you remove to me your esteemed costume. Standing amongst savage scenery, the hotel offers stupendous revelations. There is a french widow in every bedroom, affording deliteful prospects. I give personal look to the interior wants of each geust. Here you shall be well fed-up and agreeably drunk! Having once sampled our fooding, you will surely wish to enlarge your stays! Numerous bad-rooms! Full drainage! Our charges for weakly guests are scarcely creditable! Peculiar arrangements for gross parties! Our motto is ever ‘Serve You Right!’.
R. Kennard Davies.
July 13, 2008 at 2:22 pm
Hmmmm….remarkably similar to:
“Standing among savage scenery the hotel offers stupendous revelations. There is a French widow in every bedroom. I give personal look to the interior wants of each guest. Here you shall be well fed up and agreeably drunk. Having once sampled our fooding you will surely wish to enlarge your stays. Numerous bad rooms. Full drainage. Our charges for weekly visitors are scarcely creditable. Peculiar arrangements for gross parties. Our motto is ever, ‘Serve you right.” The original text of part of Gerald Hoffnung’s 1958 Oxford Union address.
which I found here:
http://voxx.demon.co.uk/eccent/eccentd.php?filename=00000101.txt
I wonder which came first?
July 13, 2008 at 2:25 pm
Should, of course, be “Gerard”, not “Gerald”, which doesn’t inspire full confidence in that page, I suppose….
July 13, 2008 at 2:58 pm
It’s alleged that Hoffnung filched it from the pages of the Spectator without acknowledgement.
July 13, 2008 at 3:19 pm
Naughty Gerard….I believe his bricklayer’s story also has a much earlier provenance (it’s in one of my books without any reference to GH)….I particularly like his(?) advice to travellers; from memory, encouraging demonstration of the famous echo of the Reading Room of the British Museum, and impressing the necessity of shaking hands with each occupant when entering a railway compartment….
July 13, 2008 at 3:36 pm
It’s said that he nicked those from the NS comps for his ‘Faulty Advice to Foreigners’. Along with ‘applauding and booing speakers in the House of Commons is encouraged’ and ”Keep Left’ and ‘No Right Turn’ are political slogans and should be ignored by motorists’.
July 13, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Did he come up with *anything* original….? i suppose were he alive today he’d be recycling doggerel….apropos wordnerd’s appeal for audio here; GH would be near the top of my shortlist for readers….
….his timing was immaculate, even if his words were unoriginal….
July 13, 2008 at 7:07 pm
Even chickens that haunt wheeled red barrers.
Em’s immortality, Bill’s narcissisity,
Albatross Sam and Jack’s pitiless whore;
Alf’s equine massacre, Will’s domesticity,
Paradise John, Hal’s monotonous squaw.
Proper poets they were, writin’ verse with their quills:
Red roses and summers’ days, gold daffodils,
Blue hills remembered, the riffin’ of “If”;
(No rude stuff ’bout blue pills for members unstiff.)
Mighty rulers of yore, inspirational muses:
Them’s suitable subjects a real poet chooses.
Like everything else, verse has gone to to the dogs:
I’m blamin’ it all on these new-fangled blogs….
***********************************
hi doggerel, i think i understood almost every word of it! and thought my God , c.s. must have suddenly aged eons! Congratulations!
July 13, 2008 at 7:08 pm
Dear Sir or Madam,
Having recently taken over the propriety of this notorious house, I am wishful that you remove to me your esteemed costume. Standing amongst savage scenery, the hotel offers stupendous revelations. There is a french widow in every bedroom, affording deliteful prospects. I give personal look to the interior wants of each geust. Here you shall be well fed-up and agreeably drunk! Having once sampled our fooding, you will surely wish to enlarge your stays! Numerous bad-rooms! Full drainage! Our charges for weakly guests are scarcely creditable! Peculiar arrangements for gross parties! Our motto is ever ‘Serve You Right!’.
¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨¨
Now that is fantastic stuff, i couldn´t do it better myself.
July 13, 2008 at 7:11 pm
bookofsand, recognise the email address is the same as ropeofsand,
you are here on who’s behalf?
¨¨¨¨¨
MINERVA, Minervita…
;:)
July 14, 2008 at 3:23 am
Bwaah hah hah….the best search yet that leads the unsuspecting to this site:
“anglo-saxon smily canned laughter”
I mean: what was the intention of such a search….?
(I should add: welcome to my humble site….we are a strange but friendly crowd….)
July 14, 2008 at 4:21 am
Hey, I’m claiming a referral fee for the canned laughter.
July 14, 2008 at 4:30 am
4.21 am….? Don’t you ever sleep….?
July 14, 2008 at 6:29 am
Was working. Nights work best for me when deadlines scream.
And I still want my referral fee.
July 14, 2008 at 6:58 am
fmk, I think that fee is mishari’s due:
mishari Says:
April 17, 2008 at 8:01 pm
where did that poxy ’smiley’ thing come from? I HATE those things. They’re like canned laughter…
I know, I know … I should have better things to do that google ‘anglo-saxon smily canned laughter’ to see how steve’s inadvertant lurker stumbled onto his blog … ah the vagaries of procrastination …
July 14, 2008 at 7:46 am
At seven in the morning you definitely *should* have better things to do than try to help steve shill me out of a referral fee! I coulda bin rich! I coulda had enough to retire on and not be up this late meeting a deadline!
July 14, 2008 at 8:23 am
seven in the morning is four in the afternoon for me … Sydneysider.
Speaking of Sydney, we have the pope over here at the moment for ‘World Youth Day’… I make no comment … the place is packed with pilgrims and today I looked up at a clear blue sky to see that pilot graffiti artists had left white signs of the cross on the firmament – weird.
July 14, 2008 at 9:08 am
even weirder when they started to dissolve and drift away … ‘ectoplasm’ was my first thought, swiftly followed by ‘it’d be cool if that big cartoon finger appeared with the zap sparking from the tip, that’d really freak people out’, then I thought ‘jeez I need a drink’
July 14, 2008 at 11:01 am
Are WN7’s posts now being written by Des?
July 14, 2008 at 11:29 am
maybe they share the same dealer?
July 14, 2008 at 12:12 pm
Interesting thought, parallax
July 14, 2008 at 12:27 pm
BM: I mentioned Henry Handel Richardson before, as a female writer early c20th. I bought her Australia Felix trilogy over the weekend, written 1919 – 1927 I think(they were 50p each). Seems she was more influenced by the French realists (esp. Zola) than there being anything of modernism about her. She lived in Germany, and translated some Scandinavian (?) works into English.
Apparently, she wrote under a man’s name because she heard a critic say that he could tell whether a writer was a man or a woman merely from the text (or some such story) and wanted to prove him wrong.
July 14, 2008 at 1:37 pm
obooki: I’ve been looking out for some HHR since your mention, but so far nothing. Will keep looking. Thanks.